lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 04 Oct 2019 17:22:24 +0200
From:   Christian Kellner <christian@...lner.me>
To:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Mario.Limonciello@...l.com, yehezkelshb@...il.com,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, andreas.noever@...il.com,
        michael.jamet@...el.com, rajmohan.mani@...el.com,
        nicholas.johnson-opensource@...look.com.au, lukas@...ner.de,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
        anthony.wong@...onical.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 17/22] thunderbolt: Add initial support for USB4

On Fri, 2019-10-04 at 18:16 +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > Is there any harm of also having the 'generation' exposed
> > as well? I like the simplicity of the mapping from that value to
> > Thunderbolt/USB4 standard version (e.g. I would show that in
> > 'boltctl
> > list'); 'hw_version' will need a bit more "interpreting".
> 
> If generation is the only thing you need, we can export that now and
> forget hw_version :)
Sounds good to me, that is should indeed be good enough for bolt.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ