[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1570210647.5046.78.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 13:37:27 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] tpm: Detach page allocation from tpm_buf
On Fri, 2019-10-04 at 09:37 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-10-03 at 21:51 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > As has been seen recently, binding the buffer allocation and tpm_buf
> > together is sometimes far from optimal.
>
> Can you elaborate on this a bit more? I must have missed the
> discussion.
Refer to e13cd21ffd50 ("tpm: Wrap the buffer from the caller to
tpm_buf in tpm_send()") for the details.
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists