linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] clk: qcom: Add Global Clock controller (GCC) driver for SC7180

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <81a2fa46-a7e6-66a2-9649-009f22813c81@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Fri, 4 Oct 2019 23:09:31 +0530
From:   Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc:     David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] clk: qcom: Add Global Clock controller (GCC)
 driver for SC7180

Hi Stephen,

On 10/3/2019 9:31 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Taniya Das (2019-10-03 03:31:15)
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> On 10/1/2019 8:08 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>
>>> Why do you want to keep them critical and registered? I'm suggesting
>>> that any clk that is marked critical and doesn't have a parent should
>>> instead become a register write in probe to turn the clk on.
>>>
>> Sure, let me do a one-time enable from probe for the clocks which
>> doesn't have a parent.
>> But I would now have to educate the clients of these clocks to remove
>> using them.
>>
> 
> If anyone is using these clks we can return NULL from the provider for
> the specifier so that we indicate there isn't support for them in the
> kernel. At least I hope that code path still works given all the recent
> changes to clk_get().
> 

Could you please confirm if you are referring to update the below?

--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static struct clk_hw *qcom_cc_clk_hw_get(struct 
of_phandle_args *clkspec,
                 return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
         }

-       return cc->rclks[idx] ? &cc->rclks[idx]->hw : ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
+       return cc->rclks[idx] ? &cc->rclks[idx]->hw : NULL;
  }


-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.

--