linux-kernel - [PATCH v9 02/17] selftests/x86/fsgsbase: Test GS selector on ptracer-induced GS base write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1570212969-21888-3-git-send-email-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Date:   Fri,  4 Oct 2019 11:15:54 -0700
From:   "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, bp@...en8.de,
        luto@...nel.org
Cc:     hpa@...or.com, dave.hansen@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
        ak@...ux.intel.com, ravi.v.shankar@...el.com,
        chang.seok.bae@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH v9 02/17] selftests/x86/fsgsbase: Test GS selector on ptracer-induced GS base write

The test validates that the selector is not changed when a ptracer writes
the ptracee's GS base.

Originally-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
---

Changes from v8: none

Changes from v7:
* Trimmed down the changes as most codes from v7 were already merged
* Included Andy's additional comments and messages when testing old
  kernels
* Used 'GS base' consistently, instead of 'GSBASE'
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/fsgsbase.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/fsgsbase.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/fsgsbase.c
index 15a329d..950a48b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/fsgsbase.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/fsgsbase.c
@@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ static void test_ptrace_write_gsbase(void)
 	wait(&status);
 
 	if (WSTOPSIG(status) == SIGTRAP) {
-		unsigned long gs, base;
+		unsigned long gs;
 		unsigned long gs_offset = USER_REGS_OFFSET(gs);
 		unsigned long base_offset = USER_REGS_OFFSET(gs_base);
 
@@ -481,7 +481,6 @@ static void test_ptrace_write_gsbase(void)
 			err(1, "PTRACE_POKEUSER");
 
 		gs = ptrace(PTRACE_PEEKUSER, child, gs_offset, NULL);
-		base = ptrace(PTRACE_PEEKUSER, child, base_offset, NULL);
 
 		/*
 		 * In a non-FSGSBASE system, the nonzero selector will load
@@ -489,11 +488,21 @@ static void test_ptrace_write_gsbase(void)
 		 * selector value is changed or not by the GSBASE write in
 		 * a ptracer.
 		 */
-		if (gs == 0 && base == 0xFF) {
-			printf("[OK]\tGS was reset as expected\n");
-		} else {
+		if (gs != *shared_scratch) {
 			nerrs++;
-			printf("[FAIL]\tGS=0x%lx, GSBASE=0x%lx (should be 0, 0xFF)\n", gs, base);
+			printf("[FAIL]\tGS changed to %lx\n", gs);
+
+			/*
+			 * On older kernels, poking a nonzero value into the
+			 * base would zero the selector.  On newer kernels,
+			 * this behavior has changed -- poking the base
+			 * changes only the base and, if FSGSBASE is not
+			 * available, this may not effect.
+			 */
+			if (gs == 0)
+				printf("\tNote: this is expected behavior on older kernels.\n");
+		} else {
+			printf("[OK]\tGS remained 0x%hx\n", *shared_scratch);
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
2.7.4