linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/15] iomap: Support large pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 4 Oct 2019 12:34:18 -0700
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/15] iomap: Support large pages

On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 09:32:11PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:52:02 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
> > 
> > @@ -1415,6 +1415,8 @@ static inline void clear_page_pfmemalloc(struct page *page)
> >  extern void pagefault_out_of_memory(void);
> >  
> >  #define offset_in_page(p)	((unsigned long)(p) & ~PAGE_MASK)
> 
> With the above define, the page_offset function is not named as badly
> as 03/15 claims.

Just because there exists a function that does the job, does not mean that
the other function is correctly named.

> > +#define offset_in_this_page(page, p)	\
> > +	((unsigned long)(p) & (page_size(page) - 1))
> 
> What if Ted will post a rfc with offset_in_that_page defined next week?

Are you trying to be funny?