linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/11] IB/hfi1: convert __mmu_int

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191004194111.2ntsr5kus5dgnnt4@linux-p48b>
Date:   Fri, 4 Oct 2019 12:41:11 -0700
From:   Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To:     Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...el.com>,
        Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] IB/hfi1: convert __mmu_int_rb to half closed
 intervals

On Fri, 04 Oct 2019, Michel Lespinasse wrote:

>On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 01:18:52PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/mmu_rb.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/mmu_rb.c
>> index 14d2a90964c3..fb6382b2d44e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/mmu_rb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/mmu_rb.c
>> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/list.h>
>>  #include <linux/rculist.h>
>>  #include <linux/mmu_notifier.h>
>> -#include <linux/interval_tree_generic.h>
>> +#include <linux/interval_tree_gen.h>
>>
>>  #include "mmu_rb.h"
>>  #include "trace.h"
>> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static unsigned long mmu_node_start(struct mmu_rb_node *node)
>>
>>  static unsigned long mmu_node_last(struct mmu_rb_node *node)
>>  {
>> -	return PAGE_ALIGN(node->addr + node->len) - 1;
>> +	return PAGE_ALIGN(node->addr + node->len);
>>  }
>
>May as well rename the function mmu_node_end(). I was worried if it
>was used anywhere else, but it turned out it's only used when defining
>the interval tree.

Right.

In general I tried not to rename everything to end because I wanted to
avoid bloating the diffstat, albeit having naming discrepancies within
the code (which isn't new either fwiw).

>
>I would also suggest moving this function (as well as mmu_node_first)
>right before its use, rather than just after, which would allow you to
>also remove the function prototype a few lines earlier.

Indeed, but again I don't want to unnecessarily grow the patch. I have
several notes to come back to once/if this series is settled.

>
>Looks good to me otherwise.
>
>Reviewed-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>

Thanks,
Davidlohr