lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4d25d751-d03a-29c6-950b-cafe8d201784@shipmail.org>
Date:   Sat, 5 Oct 2019 14:29:40 +0200
From:   Thomas Hellström (VMware) 
        <thomas_os@...pmail.org>
To:     Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
Cc:     "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Subject: hmm pud-entry callback locking?

Hi, Jerome,

I was asked by Kirill to try to unify the pagewalk pud_entry and 
pmd_entry callbacks. The only user of the pagewalk pud-entry is 
currently hmm.

But the pagewalk code call pud_entry only for huge puds with the 
page-table lock held, whereas the hmm callback appears to assume it gets 
called unconditionally without the page-table lock held?

Could you shed some light into this?

Thanks,
Thomas


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ