linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 regression fix] Input: soc_button_array - partial revert of support for newer surface devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 5 Oct 2019 15:33:06 +0200
From:   Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-input@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 regression fix] Input: soc_button_array - partial
 revert of support for newer surface devices

Hi,

On 10/5/19 3:20 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> S-o-b is only for patches which pass through your hands, e.g. if
> you make changes to my patch and submit a v2 of it.
> 
> I guess you mean / want one of:
> 
> Acked-by: ...
> 
> or
> 
> Reviewed-by: ...
> 
> 
> ?

I apologize if the s-o-b was misplaced here, it was meant for the
modification proposed below. I can send a v2 if requested, but I felt
this was a change that I wanted to bring up here first, to see if anyone
has any comments on it.

Regards,

Maximilian