[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50421413-f535-a608-fa7d-1b337eeb95e5@web.de>
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2019 16:34:09 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Navid Emamdoost <emamd001@....edu>, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>,
Stephen McCamant <smccaman@....edu>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: unittest: fix memory leak in unittest_data_add
> In unittest_data_add, a copy buffer is created via kmemdup. This buffer
> is leaked if of_fdt_unflatten_tree fails. The release for the
> unittest_data buffer is added.
Can a wording like the following be nicer for the change description?
The buffer “__dtb_testcases_begin” will be duplicated to the local
variable “unittest_data”. Release the corresponding memory
after a call of the function “of_fdt_unflatten_tree” failed
in the implementation of the function “unittest_data_add”.
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists