linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/13] iio: cros_ec: Report hwfifo_watermark

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191005173730.4a6895ed@archlinux>
Date:   Sat, 5 Oct 2019 17:37:30 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>
Cc:     knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net,
        lee.jones@...aro.org, bleung@...omium.org,
        enric.balletbo@...labora.com, dianders@...omium.org,
        groeck@...omium.org, fabien.lahoudere@...labora.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] iio: cros_ec: Report hwfifo_watermark_max

On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 10:50:20 -0700
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org> wrote:

> Report the maximum amount of sample the EC can hold.
> This is not tunable, but can be useful for application to find out the
> maximum amount of time it can sleep when hwfifo_timeout is set to a
> large number.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>
Looks good to me. I'm adding tags because I have no idea what route
this will eventually take and it saves me trying to remember which
patches need another look in v2.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> ---
>  .../cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c    | 35 +++++++++++++++++--
>  .../linux/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors_core.h   |  4 ++-
>  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> index a31a761e3a81..a32260c9bc09 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,12 @@
>  #include <linux/platform_data/cros_ec_sensorhub.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  
> +/*
> + * Hard coded to the first device to support sensor fifo.  The EC has a 2048
> + * byte fifo and will trigger an interrupt when fifo is 2/3 full.
> + */
> +#define CROS_EC_FIFO_SIZE (2048 * 2 / 3)
> +
>  static char *cros_ec_loc[] = {
>  	[MOTIONSENSE_LOC_BASE] = "base",
>  	[MOTIONSENSE_LOC_LID] = "lid",
> @@ -56,8 +62,15 @@ static int cros_ec_get_host_cmd_version_mask(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev,
>  
>  static void get_default_min_max_freq(enum motionsensor_type type,
>  				     u32 *min_freq,
> -				     u32 *max_freq)
> +				     u32 *max_freq,
> +				     u32 *max_fifo_events)
>  {
> +	/*
> +	 * We don't know fifo size, set to size previously used by older
> +	 * hardware.
> +	 */
> +	*max_fifo_events = CROS_EC_FIFO_SIZE;
> +
>  	switch (type) {
>  	case MOTIONSENSE_TYPE_ACCEL:
>  	case MOTIONSENSE_TYPE_GYRO:
> @@ -122,6 +135,7 @@ static ssize_t cros_ec_sensor_set_report_latency(struct device *dev,
>  	return len;
>  }
>  
> +
>  static ssize_t cros_ec_sensor_get_report_latency(struct device *dev,
>  					      struct device_attribute *attr,
>  					      char *buf)
> @@ -149,8 +163,22 @@ static IIO_DEVICE_ATTR(hwfifo_timeout, 0644,
>  		       cros_ec_sensor_get_report_latency,
>  		       cros_ec_sensor_set_report_latency, 0);
>  
> +static ssize_t hwfifo_watermark_max_show(
> +		struct device *dev,
> +		struct device_attribute *attr,
> +		char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_to_iio_dev(dev);
> +	struct cros_ec_sensors_core_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +
> +	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", st->fifo_max_event_count);
> +}
> +
> +static IIO_DEVICE_ATTR_RO(hwfifo_watermark_max, 0);
> +
>  static const struct attribute *cros_ec_sensor_fifo_attributes[] = {
>  	&iio_dev_attr_hwfifo_timeout.dev_attr.attr,
> +	&iio_dev_attr_hwfifo_watermark_max.dev_attr.attr,
>  	NULL,
>  };
>  
> @@ -251,12 +279,15 @@ int cros_ec_sensors_core_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  		if (state->msg->version < 3) {
>  			get_default_min_max_freq(state->resp->info.type,
>  						 &state->frequencies[1],
> -						 &state->frequencies[2]);
> +						 &state->frequencies[2],
> +						 &state->fifo_max_event_count);
>  		} else {
>  			state->frequencies[1] =
>  			    state->resp->info_3.min_frequency;
>  			state->frequencies[2] =
>  			    state->resp->info_3.max_frequency;
> +			state->fifo_max_event_count =
> +			    state->resp->info_3.fifo_max_event_count;
>  		}
>  
>  		if (cros_ec_check_features(ec, EC_FEATURE_MOTION_SENSE_FIFO)) {
> diff --git a/include/linux/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors_core.h b/include/linux/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors_core.h
> index 60f78f0e4884..2c6acbde0d02 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors_core.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors_core.h
> @@ -54,7 +54,8 @@ typedef irqreturn_t (*cros_ec_sensors_capture_t)(int irq, void *p);
>   *				the timestamp. The timestamp is always last and
>   *				is always 8-byte aligned.
>   * @read_ec_sensors_data:	function used for accessing sensors values
> - * @cuur_sampl_freq:		current sampling period
> + * @curr_sampl_freq:		current sampling period
> + * @fifo_max_event_count:	Size of the EC sensor FIFO
>   */
>  struct cros_ec_sensors_core_state {
>  	struct cros_ec_device *ec;
> @@ -78,6 +79,7 @@ struct cros_ec_sensors_core_state {
>  				    unsigned long scan_mask, s16 *data);
>  
>  	int curr_sampl_freq;
> +	u32 fifo_max_event_count;
>  
>  	/* Table of known available frequencies : 0, Min and Max in mHz */
>  	int frequencies[3];