[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <673eaa62-f5b2-7ad4-6ea0-6a190e3ce509@web.de>
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2019 19:49:46 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
cocci@...teme.lip6.fr, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>,
Matthias Männich <maennich@...gle.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Cocci] [RFC] scripts: Fix coccicheck failed
>> Would you like to take the change possibility into account
>> that the coccicheck system configuration should be adapted instead?
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/scripts/coccicheck?id=4ea655343ce4180fe9b2c7ec8cb8ef9884a47901#n257
>
> I prefer the one line change for now.
Thanks for this information.
> If more issues arise one can see what is more desirable at a larger scale.
I suggest to reconsider the corresponding software design consequences now.
* Do you accept only SmPL scripts which will work together with
the operation mode “report” of the tool “coccicheck”?
* Under which circumstances will your change resistance evolve in the way
that a clear file type separation can be applied finally?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists