[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZ_+YKKmNrho5edu7hn8UsOCPySSn2YMWz+qjYwMxgvpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2019 21:01:37 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@...sung.com>,
Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] regulator: switch to using [devm_]fwnode_gpiod_get_index
On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 1:10 AM Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
> This series swiches regulator drivers form using
> [devm_]gpiod_get_from_of_node() that is scheduled to be removed in favor
> of [devm_]fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that behaves more like standard
> [devm_]gpiod_get_index() and will potentially handle secondary software
> nodes in cases we need to augment platform firmware.
The series:
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Too bad with the build robots being unable to parse the
pull deps. Now they hammer out complaints.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists