[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191006095042.GA2918514@kroah.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 11:50:42 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Gabriela Bittencourt <gabrielabittencourt00@...il.com>
Cc: outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com, johan@...nel.org,
elder@...nel.org, greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: add blank line after declarations
On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 06:00:46PM -0300, Gabriela Bittencourt wrote:
> Fix CHECK: add blank line after declarations
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriela Bittencourt <gabrielabittencourt00@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/greybus/control.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/control.h b/drivers/staging/greybus/control.h
> index 3a29ec05f631..5a45d55349a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/control.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/control.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ struct gb_control {
> char *vendor_string;
> char *product_string;
> };
> +
> #define to_gb_control(d) container_of(d, struct gb_control, dev)
No, the original code is "better" here, it's a common pattern despite
what checkpatch.pl tells you, sorry.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists