| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20191006142952.hgfg2agypwpf2v55@arbad>
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 16:29:56 +0200
From: Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>
To: jic23@...nel.org
Cc: knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net,
zbynek.kocur@....cvut.cz, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] iio: srf04: fix wrong limitation in distance measuring
The measured time value in the driver is limited to the maximum distance
which can be read by the sensor. This limitation was wrong and is fixed
by this patch.
It also takes into account that we are supporting a variety of sensors
today and that the recently added sensors have a higher maximum
distance range.
Changes in v2:
- Added a Tested-by
Suggested-by: Zbyněk Kocur <zbynek.kocur@....cvut.cz>
Tested-by: Zbyněk Kocur <zbynek.kocur@....cvut.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>
---
drivers/iio/proximity/srf04.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/srf04.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/srf04.c
index 8b50d56b0a03..01eb8cc63076 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/proximity/srf04.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/srf04.c
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static int srf04_read(struct srf04_data *data)
udelay(data->cfg->trigger_pulse_us);
gpiod_set_value(data->gpiod_trig, 0);
- /* it cannot take more than 20 ms */
+ /* it should not take more than 20 ms until echo is rising */
ret = wait_for_completion_killable_timeout(&data->rising, HZ/50);
if (ret < 0) {
mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
@@ -120,7 +120,8 @@ static int srf04_read(struct srf04_data *data)
return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
- ret = wait_for_completion_killable_timeout(&data->falling, HZ/50);
+ /* it cannot take more than 50 ms until echo is falling */
+ ret = wait_for_completion_killable_timeout(&data->falling, HZ/20);
if (ret < 0) {
mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
return ret;
@@ -135,19 +136,19 @@ static int srf04_read(struct srf04_data *data)
dt_ns = ktime_to_ns(ktime_dt);
/*
- * measuring more than 3 meters is beyond the capabilities of
- * the sensor
+ * measuring more than 6,45 meters is beyond the capabilities of
+ * the supported sensors
* ==> filter out invalid results for not measuring echos of
* another us sensor
*
* formula:
- * distance 3 m
- * time = ---------- = --------- = 9404389 ns
- * speed 319 m/s
+ * distance 6,45 * 2 m
+ * time = ---------- = ------------ = 40438871 ns
+ * speed 319 m/s
*
* using a minimum speed at -20 °C of 319 m/s
*/
- if (dt_ns > 9404389)
+ if (dt_ns > 40438871)
return -EIO;
time_ns = dt_ns;
@@ -159,20 +160,20 @@ static int srf04_read(struct srf04_data *data)
* with Temp in °C
* and speed in m/s
*
- * use 343 m/s as ultrasonic speed at 20 °C here in absence of the
+ * use 343,5 m/s as ultrasonic speed at 20 °C here in absence of the
* temperature
*
* therefore:
- * time 343
- * distance = ------ * -----
- * 10^6 2
+ * time 343,5 time * 106
+ * distance = ------ * ------- = ------------
+ * 10^6 2 617176
* with time in ns
* and distance in mm (one way)
*
- * because we limit to 3 meters the multiplication with 343 just
+ * because we limit to 6,45 meters the multiplication with 106 just
* fits into 32 bit
*/
- distance_mm = time_ns * 343 / 2000000;
+ distance_mm = time_ns * 106 / 617176;
return distance_mm;
}
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists