[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191006173202.GA832@sol.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 10:32:02 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>,
syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
Mattias Nissler <mnissler@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 30/47] ANDROID: binder: remove waitqueue when thread
exits.
On Sun, Oct 06, 2019 at 07:21:17PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> From: Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>
>
> commit f5cb779ba16334b45ba8946d6bfa6d9834d1527f upstream.
>
> binder_poll() passes the thread->wait waitqueue that
> can be slept on for work. When a thread that uses
> epoll explicitly exits using BINDER_THREAD_EXIT,
> the waitqueue is freed, but it is never removed
> from the corresponding epoll data structure. When
> the process subsequently exits, the epoll cleanup
> code tries to access the waitlist, which results in
> a use-after-free.
>
> Prevent this by using POLLFREE when the thread exits.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>
> Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
> Cc: stable <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 4.14
> [backport BINDER_LOOPER_STATE_POLL logic as well]
> Signed-off-by: Mattias Nissler <mnissler@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> ---
> drivers/android/binder.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/android/binder.c
> +++ b/drivers/android/binder.c
> @@ -334,7 +334,8 @@ enum {
> BINDER_LOOPER_STATE_EXITED = 0x04,
> BINDER_LOOPER_STATE_INVALID = 0x08,
> BINDER_LOOPER_STATE_WAITING = 0x10,
> - BINDER_LOOPER_STATE_NEED_RETURN = 0x20
> + BINDER_LOOPER_STATE_NEED_RETURN = 0x20,
> + BINDER_LOOPER_STATE_POLL = 0x40,
> };
>
> struct binder_thread {
> @@ -2628,6 +2629,18 @@ static int binder_free_thread(struct bin
> } else
> BUG();
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * If this thread used poll, make sure we remove the waitqueue
> + * from any epoll data structures holding it with POLLFREE.
> + * waitqueue_active() is safe to use here because we're holding
> + * the inner lock.
> + */
> + if ((thread->looper & BINDER_LOOPER_STATE_POLL) &&
> + waitqueue_active(&thread->wait)) {
> + wake_up_poll(&thread->wait, POLLHUP | POLLFREE);
> + }
> +
> if (send_reply)
> binder_send_failed_reply(send_reply, BR_DEAD_REPLY);
> binder_release_work(&thread->todo);
> @@ -2651,6 +2664,8 @@ static unsigned int binder_poll(struct f
> return POLLERR;
> }
>
> + thread->looper |= BINDER_LOOPER_STATE_POLL;
> +
> wait_for_proc_work = thread->transaction_stack == NULL &&
> list_empty(&thread->todo) && thread->return_error == BR_OK;
>
Are you sure this backport is correct, given that in 4.9, binder_poll()
sometimes uses proc->wait instead of thread->wait?:
wait_for_proc_work = thread->transaction_stack == NULL &&
list_empty(&thread->todo) && thread->return_error == BR_OK;
binder_unlock(__func__);
if (wait_for_proc_work) {
if (binder_has_proc_work(proc, thread))
return POLLIN;
poll_wait(filp, &proc->wait, wait);
if (binder_has_proc_work(proc, thread))
return POLLIN;
} else {
if (binder_has_thread_work(thread))
return POLLIN;
poll_wait(filp, &thread->wait, wait);
if (binder_has_thread_work(thread))
return POLLIN;
}
return 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists