[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191006171132.572610019@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 19:21:29 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Xiumei Mu <xmu@...hat.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 53/68] net: ipv4: avoid mixed n_redirects and rate_tokens usage
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
[ Upstream commit b406472b5ad79ede8d10077f0c8f05505ace8b6d ]
Since commit c09551c6ff7f ("net: ipv4: use a dedicated counter
for icmp_v4 redirect packets") we use 'n_redirects' to account
for redirect packets, but we still use 'rate_tokens' to compute
the redirect packets exponential backoff.
If the device sent to the relevant peer any ICMP error packet
after sending a redirect, it will also update 'rate_token' according
to the leaking bucket schema; typically 'rate_token' will raise
above BITS_PER_LONG and the redirect packets backoff algorithm
will produce undefined behavior.
Fix the issue using 'n_redirects' to compute the exponential backoff
in ip_rt_send_redirect().
Note that we still clear rate_tokens after a redirect silence period,
to avoid changing an established behaviour.
The root cause predates git history; before the mentioned commit in
the critical scenario, the kernel stopped sending redirects, after
the mentioned commit the behavior more randomic.
Reported-by: Xiumei Mu <xmu@...hat.com>
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Fixes: c09551c6ff7f ("net: ipv4: use a dedicated counter for icmp_v4 redirect packets")
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/ipv4/route.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -925,16 +925,15 @@ void ip_rt_send_redirect(struct sk_buff
if (peer->rate_tokens == 0 ||
time_after(jiffies,
(peer->rate_last +
- (ip_rt_redirect_load << peer->rate_tokens)))) {
+ (ip_rt_redirect_load << peer->n_redirects)))) {
__be32 gw = rt_nexthop(rt, ip_hdr(skb)->daddr);
icmp_send(skb, ICMP_REDIRECT, ICMP_REDIR_HOST, gw);
peer->rate_last = jiffies;
- ++peer->rate_tokens;
++peer->n_redirects;
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_VERBOSE
if (log_martians &&
- peer->rate_tokens == ip_rt_redirect_number)
+ peer->n_redirects == ip_rt_redirect_number)
net_warn_ratelimited("host %pI4/if%d ignores redirects for %pI4 to %pI4\n",
&ip_hdr(skb)->saddr, inet_iif(skb),
&ip_hdr(skb)->daddr, &gw);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists