linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Convert filldir[64]() from __put_user() to unsafe_put

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgrqwuZJmwbrjhjCFeSUu2i57unaGOnP4qZAmSyuGwMZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 6 Oct 2019 16:06:16 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Convert filldir[64]() from __put_user() to unsafe_put_user()

On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 3:20 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>
> this patch causes all my sparc64 emulations to stall during boot. It causes
> all alpha emulations to crash with [1a] and [1b] when booting from a virtual
> disk, and one of the xtensa emulations to crash with [2].

Ho humm. I've run variations of that patch over a few years on x86,
but obviously not on alpha/sparc.

At least I should still be able to read alpha assembly, even after all
these years. Would you mind sending me the result of

    make fs/readdir.s

on alpha with the broken config? I'd hope that the sparc issue is the same.

Actually, could you also do

    make fs/readdir.o

and then send me the "objdump --disassemble" of that? That way I get
the instruction offsets without having to count by hand.

> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000000004
> rcS(47): Oops -1
> pc = [<0000000000000004>]  ra = [<fffffc00004512e4>]  ps = 0000    Not tainted
> pc is at 0x4

That is _funky_. I'm not seeing how it could possibly jump to 0x4, but
it clearly does.

That said, are you sure it's _that_ commit? Because this pattern:

> a0 = fffffc0007dbca56  a1 = 2f2f2f2f2f2f2f2f  a2 = 000000000000000a

implicates the memchr('/') call in the next one. That's a word full of
'/' characters.

Of course, it could just be left-over register contents from that
memchr(), but it makes me wonder. Particularly since it seems to
happen early in filldir64():

> ra is at filldir64+0x64/0x320

which is just a fairly small handful of instructions in, and I
wouldn't be shocked if that's the return address for the call to
memchr.

              Linus