[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191006094615.5b798a42@archlinux>
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 09:46:15 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
Cc: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] counter: stm32: clean up indentation issue
On Sat, 5 Oct 2019 13:30:04 -0400
William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:51:26AM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> >
> > There is an if statement that is indented one level too deeply,
> > remove the extraneous tabs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/counter/stm32-timer-cnt.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/counter/stm32-timer-cnt.c b/drivers/counter/stm32-timer-cnt.c
> > index 644ba18a72ad..613dcccf79e1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/counter/stm32-timer-cnt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/counter/stm32-timer-cnt.c
> > @@ -219,8 +219,8 @@ static ssize_t stm32_count_enable_write(struct counter_device *counter,
> >
> > if (enable) {
> > regmap_read(priv->regmap, TIM_CR1, &cr1);
> > - if (!(cr1 & TIM_CR1_CEN))
> > - clk_enable(priv->clk);
> > + if (!(cr1 & TIM_CR1_CEN))
> > + clk_enable(priv->clk);
> >
> > regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, TIM_CR1, TIM_CR1_CEN,
> > TIM_CR1_CEN);
> > --
> > 2.20.1
>
> Acked-by: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing
for the autobuilders to poke it.
Thanks,
Jonathan
>
> Fabrice,
>
> I noticed the TIM_CR1_CEN check is happening before the
> regmap_update_bits call for the enable path, while the disable path does
> the check after. Is this logic is correct.
>
> William Breathitt Gray
Powered by blists - more mailing lists