linux-kernel - [RFC 0/1] s390/purgatory: Make sure we fail the build if purgatory has missing symbols

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon,  7 Oct 2019 20:07:02 +0200
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC 0/1] s390/purgatory: Make sure we fail the build if purgatory has missing symbols

Hi s390 maintainers,

This patch mirrors a similar patch for x86, but it has been untested
because I do not have a mainframe to compile on :)

In 5.4-rc1 the 2 different sha256 implementations for the purgatory resp.
for crypto/sha256_generic.c have been consolidated into 1 single shared
implementation under lib/crypto/sha256.c .

At least on x86 this was causing silent corruption of the purgatory due
to a missing memzero_explicit symbol in the purgatory string.c/.o file.

With the x86 equivalent of this patch applied a x86 build of 5.4-rc1 now
correctly fails:

  CHK     arch/x86/purgatory/purgatory.ro
ld: arch/x86/purgatory/purgatory.ro: in function `sha256_transform':
sha256.c:(.text+0x1c0c): undefined reference to `memzero_explicit'
make[2]: *** [arch/x86/purgatory/Makefile:72:
    arch/x86/purgatory/kexec-purgatory.c] Error 1
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:509: arch/x86/purgatory] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:1650: arch/x86] Error 2

It would be great if the s390 maintainers can test this equivalent patch
on s390.

As for fixing the missing memzero_explicit symbol, we are currently
discussing making memzero_explicit a static inline wrapper of memset
in string.h, so that we do not need to implement it in multiple places.

This discussion is Cc-ed to the generic linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org list,
it is happening in the
"[PATCH v2 5.4 regression fix] x86/boot: Provide memzero_explicit" thread.

Regards,

Hans