[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191007202904.GA6883@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 13:29:04 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Cree <mcree@...on.net.nz>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Convert filldir[64]() from __put_user() to
unsafe_put_user()
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 12:21:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 3:20 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> >
> > this patch causes all my sparc64 emulations to stall during boot. It causes
> > all alpha emulations to crash with [1a] and [1b] when booting from a virtual
> > disk, and one of the xtensa emulations to crash with [2].
>
> So I think your alpha emulation environment may be broken, because
> Michael Cree reports that it works for him on real hardware, but he
> does see the kernel unaligned count being high.
>
Yes, that possibility always exists, unfortunately.
> But regardless, this is my current fairly minimal patch that I think
> should fix the unaligned issue, while still giving the behavior we
> want on x86. I hope Al can do something nicer, but I think this is
> "acceptable".
>
> I'm running this now on x86, and I verified that x86-32 code
> generation looks sane too, but it woudl be good to verify that this
> makes the alignment issue go away on other architectures.
>
> Linus
I started a complete test run with the patch applied. I'll let you know
how it went after it is complete - it should be done in a couple of hours.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists