linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Add Support for Intel LGM SDXC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 7 Oct 2019 15:33:43 +0800
From:   "Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX" 
        <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, michal.simek@...inx.com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        andriy.shevchenko@...el.com, cheol.yong.kim@...el.com,
        qi-ming.wu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Add Support for Intel LGM
 SDXC

Hi Adrian,

On 3/10/2019 3:46 PM, Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
>  Thank you for the comments.
>
> On 3/10/2019 3:02 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 3/10/19 7:00 AM, Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
>>> From: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan 
>>> <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@...ux.intel.com>
>>>
>>> The current arasan sdhci PHY configuration isn't compatible
>>> with the PHY on Intel's LGM(Lightning Mountain) SoC devices.
>>>
>>> Therefore, add a new compatible, to adapt the Intel's LGM
>>> SDXC PHY with arasan-sdhc controller to configure the PHY.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan 
>>> <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@...ux.intel.com>
>> Aren't these patches already in v5.4-rc1
>
>  No, these patches are not there in v5.4-rc1.
>
>  The one which is in v5.4-rc1 supports only eMMC, does not SD/SDIO, so 
> these patches are required.
>
can you please provide your suggestions and opinions further on the 
above reply,  to proceed, Thanks!
> ---
> With Best Regards
> Vadivel Murugan