lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH2r5mtgXZNC5wiNGRV925jB0H_HJTc_-GzBFFMoytmuJ5i-LA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Oct 2019 17:23:23 -0500
From:   Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
To:     linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     CIFS <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: 

I noticed that the commit below regressed cifs/smb3 xfstest 258 on
5.4-rc1 and later.

"Testing for negative seconds since epoch"
"Timestamp wrapped" ....

Did xfstest 258 get updated to account for the new behavior with this patch?

commit cb7a69e605908c34aad47644afeb26a765ade8d7
Author: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
Date:   Fri Mar 22 14:32:35 2019 -0700

    fs: cifs: Initialize filesystem timestamp ranges

    Fill in the appropriate limits to avoid inconsistencies
    in the vfs cached inode times when timestamps are
    outside the permitted range.

    Also fixed cnvrtDosUnixTm calculations to avoid int overflow
    while computing maximum date.


-- 
Thanks,

Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ