linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: net: adi: Fix yaml verification issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <01041a6b-7c70-bebd-d04b-9e47ce238e5e@st.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Oct 2019 16:07:17 +0200
From:   Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC:     Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Alexandru Ardelean <alexaundru.ardelean@...log.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: net: adi: Fix yaml verification issue

Hi Rob

On 10/7/19 3:56 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 5:26 AM Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com> wrote:
>>
>> This commit fixes an issue seen during yaml check ("make dt_binding_check").
>> Each enum were not declared as uint32.
>>
>> "Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/adi,adin.yaml:
>> properties:adi,rx-internal-delay-ps:
>> ..., 'enum': [1600, 1800, 2000, 2200, 2400], 'default': 2000}
>> is not valid under any of the given schemas"
> 
> You need to update dtschema. I fixed this in the meta-schema last
> week. Any property with a standard property unit suffix has a defined
> type already, so we don't need to define it again here.
> 
> I also added '-bits' to standard units.

Nice, I'm going to update my tools.

thanks
Alex

> 
> Rob
>