[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d7f83334-d731-b892-ee49-1065d64a4887@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 10:45:48 -0400
From: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: mount on tmpfs failing to parse context option
On 9/30/19 12:07 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Fedora got a bug report https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757104
> of a failure to parse options with the context mount option. From the reporter:
>
>
> $ unshare -rm mount -t tmpfs tmpfs /tmp -o 'context="system_u:object_r:container_file_t:s0:c475,c690"'
> mount: /tmp: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on tmpfs, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.
>
>
> Sep 30 16:50:42 kernel: tmpfs: Unknown parameter 'c690"'
>
> I haven't asked the reporter to bisect yet but I'm suspecting one of the
> conversion to the new mount API:
>
> $ git log --oneline v5.3..origin/master mm/shmem.c
> edf445ad7c8d Merge branch 'hugepage-fallbacks' (hugepatch patches from David Rientjes)
> 19deb7695e07 Revert "Revert "Revert "mm, thp: consolidate THP gfp handling into alloc_hugepage_direct_gfpmask""
> 28eb3c808719 shmem: fix obsolete comment in shmem_getpage_gfp()
> 4101196b19d7 mm: page cache: store only head pages in i_pages
> d8c6546b1aea mm: introduce compound_nr()
> f32356261d44 vfs: Convert ramfs, shmem, tmpfs, devtmpfs, rootfs to use the new mount API
> 626c3920aeb4 shmem_parse_one(): switch to use of fs_parse()
> e04dc423ae2c shmem_parse_options(): take handling a single option into a helper
> f6490b7fbb82 shmem_parse_options(): don't bother with mpol in separate variable
> 0b5071dd323d shmem_parse_options(): use a separate structure to keep the results
> 7e30d2a5eb0b make shmem_fill_super() static
>
>
> I didn't find another report or a fix yet. Is it worth asking the reporter to bisect?
>
> Thanks,
> Laura
Ping again, I never heard anything back and I didn't see anything come in with
-rc2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists