lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 7 Oct 2019 17:03:40 +0200
From:   David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To:     Austin Kim <austindh.kim@...il.com>
Cc:     clm@...com, josef@...icpanda.com, dsterba@...e.com,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: fix Wmaybe-uninitialized warning

On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 12:30:19PM +0900, Austin Kim wrote:
> gcc throws warning message as below:
> 
> ‘clone_src_i_size’ may be used uninitialized in this function
> [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>  #define IS_ALIGNED(x, a)  (((x) & ((typeof(x))(a) - 1)) == 0)
>                        ^
> fs/btrfs/send.c:5088:6: note: ‘clone_src_i_size’ was declared here
>  u64 clone_src_i_size;
>    ^
> The clone_src_i_size is only used as call-by-reference
> in a call to get_inode_info().
> 
> Silence the warning by initializing clone_src_i_size to 0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Austin Kim <austindh.kim@...il.com>

A few more people have repoted this warning, so I'm gonig to apply the
patch to avoid further reports. Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ