[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191007151703.z3eejxuujzt5ruth@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 10:17:03 -0500
From: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>,
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 1/3] media: ov5640: add PIXEL_RATE control
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com> wrote on Mon [2019-Oct-07 11:03:20 +0300]:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 12:24:16PM -0500, Benoit Parrot wrote:
> > @@ -2657,6 +2669,12 @@ static int ov5640_init_controls(struct ov5640_dev *sensor)
> > /* we can use our own mutex for the ctrl lock */
> > hdl->lock = &sensor->lock;
> >
> > + /* Clock related controls */
> > + ctrls->pixel_rate = v4l2_ctrl_new_std(hdl, ops, V4L2_CID_PIXEL_RATE,
> > + 0, INT_MAX, 1,
> > + ov5640_calc_pixel_rate(sensor));
> > + ctrls->pixel_rate->flags |= V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_READ_ONLY;
>
> Please check ctrls->pixel_rate first; it may be NULL here.
How about I just move this line below "if (hdl->error)" instead?
Benoit
>
> > +
> > /* Auto/manual white balance */
> > ctrls->auto_wb = v4l2_ctrl_new_std(hdl, ops,
> > V4L2_CID_AUTO_WHITE_BALANCE,
>
> --
> Sakari Ailus
> sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists