[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191007151851.GA3494@icarus>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 11:18:51 -0400
From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, bgolaszewski@...libre.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux@...musvillemoes.dk, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, preid@...ctromag.com.au, lukas@...ner.de,
sean.nyekjaer@...vas.dk, morten.tiljeset@...vas.dk,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 01/14] bitops: Introduce the for_each_set_clump8 macro
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 11:21:56AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 06, 2019 at 11:10:58AM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> > This macro iterates for each 8-bit group of bits (clump) with set bits,
> > within a bitmap memory region. For each iteration, "start" is set to the
> > bit offset of the found clump, while the respective clump value is
> > stored to the location pointed by "clump". Additionally, the
> > bitmap_get_value8 and bitmap_set_value8 functions are introduced to
> > respectively get and set an 8-bit value in a bitmap memory region.
>
> Very much thank you for an update!
> I have comments below.
>
> > +/**
> > + * bitmap_get_value8 - get an 8-bit value within a memory region
>
> Since it's in find.h I would not collide with bitmap namespace.
> How about
>
> find_and_get_value8()
We modeled the interface for these on the existing bitmap functions, so
perhaps it would be better to move bitmap_get_value8 and
bitmap_set_value8 to include/linux/bitmap.h so that they are with the
rest of the bitmap functions -- afterall, they are operating on bitmaps.
> > + * @addr: address to the bitmap memory region
> > + * @start: bit offset of the 8-bit value; must be a multiple of 8
> > + *
> > + * Returns the 8-bit value located at the @start bit offset within the @addr
> > + * memory region.
> > + */
> > +static inline unsigned long bitmap_get_value8(const unsigned long *addr,
> > + unsigned long start)
> > +{
> > + const size_t index = BIT_WORD(start);
> > + const unsigned long offset = start % BITS_PER_LONG;
> > +
> > + return (addr[index] >> offset) & 0xFF;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * bitmap_set_value8 - set an 8-bit value within a memory region
>
> find_and_set_value8()
>
> ?
>
> > + * @addr: address to the bitmap memory region
> > + * @value: the 8-bit value; values wider than 8 bits may clobber bitmap
> > + * @start: bit offset of the 8-bit value; must be a multiple of 8
> > + */
> > +static inline void bitmap_set_value8(unsigned long *addr, unsigned long value,
> > + unsigned long start)
> > +{
> > + const size_t index = BIT_WORD(start);
> > + const unsigned long offset = start % BITS_PER_LONG;
> > +
> > + addr[index] &= ~(0xFF << offset);
> > + addr[index] |= value << offset;
> > +}
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
The find_next_clump8 function can remain exposed via
include/linux/find.h since it fits in with the rest of the functions
there.
The reason I moved the definition to lib/find_bit.c is due to the
circular dependency that arose from the round_down macro. Should I try
to move the definition back to include/linux/find.h and reimplement it
without the round_down macro; or is it best to keep this simpler
implementation here in lib/find_bit.c?
William Breathitt Gray
Powered by blists - more mailing lists