[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0763a3af-16ed-d450-4980-0e6b69b06bee@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 14:06:47 +0800
From: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@...wei.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
CC: <catalin.marinas@....com>, <will.deacon@....com>,
<kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <info@...ux.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: armv8_deprecated: Checking return value for memory
allocation
On 2019/9/30 21:22, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 12:44:17PM +0800, Yunfeng Ye wrote:
>> There are no return value checking when using kzalloc() and kcalloc() for
>> memory allocation. so add it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
>> index 2ec09de..ca158be 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
>> @@ -174,6 +174,9 @@ static void __init register_insn_emulation(struct insn_emulation_ops *ops)
>> struct insn_emulation *insn;
>>
>> insn = kzalloc(sizeof(*insn), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!insn)
>> + return;
>> +
>> insn->ops = ops;
>> insn->min = INSN_UNDEF;
>>
>> @@ -233,6 +236,8 @@ static void __init register_insn_emulation_sysctl(void)
>>
>> insns_sysctl = kcalloc(nr_insn_emulated + 1, sizeof(*sysctl),
>> GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!insns_sysctl)
>> + return;
>
> Since both of these failure paths are fatal to the instruction emulation,
> can you please return an error code when the allocation fails and use that
> to fail the calling initcall() appropriately?
>
ok, I will modify as your suggest, thanks.
> Will
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists