linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/106] 4.19.78-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 7 Oct 2019 11:17:13 -0500
From:   Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/106] 4.19.78-stable review

Hello!


On 10/6/19 12:20 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.78 release.
> There are 106 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Tue 08 Oct 2019 05:07:10 PM UTC.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.78-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h


Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Patch "udp: only do GSO if # of segs > 1" updated net/ipv[46]/udp.c and the kselftest that goes with it. The system detected a failure in net/udpgso.sh this time as we are running kselftests 5.3.1, which currently includes a now-outdated version of this test. As soon as 5.3.5 is released, we'll upgrade kselftests and this test will pass again.

Because there's no regression (i.e. it passes with the updated test), there is nothing to worry about here. The same can be said of the 5.2 and 5.3 release candidates.


Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------

kernel: 4.19.78-rc1
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-4.19.y
git commit: 61e72e79b84d3a2519ad88c10964d7e4fa11ef1d
git describe: v4.19.77-107-g61e72e79b84d
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.19-oe/build/v4.19.77-107-g61e72e79b84d

No regressions (compared to build v4.19.77)

No fixes (compared to build v4.19.77)

Ran 21962 total tests in the following environments and test suites.

Environments
--------------
- dragonboard-410c - arm64
- hi6220-hikey - arm64
- i386
- juno-r2 - arm64
- qemu_arm
- qemu_arm64
- qemu_i386
- qemu_x86_64
- x15 - arm
- x86_64

Test Suites
-----------
* build
* install-android-platform-tools-r2600
* kselftest
* libhugetlbfs
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-timers-tests
* perf
* spectre-meltdown-checker-test
* v4l2-compliance
* ltp-fs-tests
* network-basic-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* kvm-unit-tests
* ssuite
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none


Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@...aro.org


-- 
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org