linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.3 000/166] 5.3.5-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191007164411.GA1054518@kroah.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Oct 2019 18:44:11 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.3 000/166] 5.3.5-stable review

On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 11:25:35AM -0500, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> 
> On 10/6/19 12:19 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.3.5 release.
> > There are 166 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Tue 08 Oct 2019 05:07:10 PM UTC.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.3.5-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.3.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> Regressions detected.

Thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.

> As mentioned, we found a problem with the mismatch of kselftests 5.3.1
> and net/udpgso.sh, but everything is fine.

That's good to hear!

greg k-h