[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191008231831.GB27781@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 23:18:31 +0000
From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
To: Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] mm/memory-failure: Poison read receives SIGKILL
instead of SIGBUS issue
Hi Jane,
I think that this patchset is good enough and ready to be merged.
Andrew, could you consider queuing this series into your tree?
Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 11:13:23AM -0700, Jane Chu wrote:
> Hi, Naoya,
>
> What is the status of the patches?
> Is there anything I need to do from my end ?
>
> Regards,
> -jane
>
> On 8/6/2019 10:25 AM, Jane Chu wrote:
> > Change in v4:
> > - remove trailing white space
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - move **tk cleanup to its own patch
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - move 'tk' allocations internal to add_to_kill(), suggested by Dan;
> > - ran checkpatch.pl check, pointed out by Matthew;
> > - Noaya pointed out that v1 would have missed the SIGKILL
> > if "tk->addr == -EFAULT", since the code returns early.
> > Incorporated Noaya's suggestion, also, skip VMAs where
> > "tk->size_shift == 0" for zone device page, and deliver SIGBUS
> > when "tk->size_shift != 0" so the payload is helpful;
> > - added Suggested-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
> >
> > Jane Chu (2):
> > mm/memory-failure.c clean up around tk pre-allocation
> > mm/memory-failure: Poison read receives SIGKILL instead of SIGBUS if
> > mmaped more than once
> >
> > mm/memory-failure.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists