[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191008234514.GB13437@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 02:45:14 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Alexander Steffen <Alexander.Steffen@...ineon.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 001/106] tpm: use tpm_try_get_ops() in tpm-sysfs.c.
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 02:51:20PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> For example this did not have any locking, and is now protected by
>
> get_device(&chip->dev);
>
> down_read(&chip->ops_sem);
>
> . Is that intended? Is this known to fix any bugs?
It is, sysfs code can otherwise race when ops is set NULL in
class shutdown.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists