lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191008061225.GA27652@lst.de>
Date:   Tue, 8 Oct 2019 08:12:25 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        "Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>,
        Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] xfs: remove the fork fields in the writepage_ctx
 and ioend

On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 08:59:44AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 06, 2019 at 05:46:06PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > In preparation for moving the writeback code to iomap.c, replace the
> > XFS-specific COW fork concept with the iomap IOMAP_F_SHARED flag.
> 
> "In preparation for switching XFS to use the fs/iomap writeback
> code..."?
> 
> I suspect the IOMAP_F_SHARED hunk I pointed out in the previous
> patch should be in this one...

All these made a whole lot more sense before Darrick reshuffled the
code.  In my original version I started massaging the XFS code so that
it can be moved to iomap without functional changes, but Darrick wanted
the iomap code added in one series and then XFS switched over, which
made a lot of things more confusing than they were intended to be.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ