[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFRkauDq=6X9LRj7APwKOV+7CVZN5OSVuWXmwBQ3QQPWD9Nauw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 18:48:15 +0800
From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>,
Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH 2/2] regulator: da9062: Simplify
da9062_buck_set_mode for BUCK_MODE_MANUAL case
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> 於 2019年10月8日 週二 下午6:44寫道:
>
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 06:41:21PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
>
> > I'm wondering if any issue with this patch?
> > Note, this patch is for da9062 (not for da9063 which is already applied).
>
> It doesn't seem to apply against current code.
I just test apply it and It looks fine to be applied by linux-next tree.
Or which branch of regulator tree should I generate the patch?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists