[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191008122459.z62tk5xqpqhfifxl@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 14:24:59 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/12] Device property improvements, add %pfw format
specifier
On Thu 2019-10-03 15:32:07, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This set adds functionality into the device property API (counting a
> node's parents as well as obtaining its name) in order to support printing
> fwnode names using a new conversion specifier "%pfw". The names that are
> produced are equivalent to its OF counterpart "%pOF" on OF systems for the
> two supported modifiers ("f" and "P").
>
> Printing a node's name is something that's been available on OF for a long
> time and if something is converted to device property API (such as the
> V4L2 fwnode framework) it always got removed of a nice feature that was
> sometimes essential in debugging. With this set, that no longer is the
> case.
The patchset is ready to go upstream from my POV.
Should it go via a tree that maintains the device property API
or via printk.git? Both possibilities work for me.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists