linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: Add AST2500 RMII RCLK definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACPK8Xf-f-r4S02GoxYdBYOJi5NGYMCOr6XGVza4vEGAsqzR9w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Oct 2019 12:37:00 +0000
From:   Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
To:     Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
Cc:     linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-aspeed <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: Add AST2500 RMII RCLK definitions

On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 11:34, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au> wrote:
>
> The AST2500 has an explicit gate for the RMII RCLK for each of the two
> MACs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
> ---
>  include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed-clock.h | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed-clock.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed-clock.h
> index f43738607d77..64e245fb113f 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed-clock.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed-clock.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@
>  #define ASPEED_CLK_BCLK                        33
>  #define ASPEED_CLK_MPLL                        34
>  #define ASPEED_CLK_24M                 35
> +#define ASPEED_CLK_GATE_MAC1RCLK       36
> +#define ASPEED_CLK_GATE_MAC2RCLK       37

Calling these ASPEED_CLK_GATE breaks the pattern the rest of the
driver has in using that name for the clocks that are registered as
struct aspeed_clk_gate clocks.

Do you think we should drop the GATE_ to match the existing clocks?


>
>  #define ASPEED_RESET_XDMA              0
>  #define ASPEED_RESET_MCTP              1
> --
> 2.20.1
>