[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGnkfhxefH+3YKDWQMCOYoj1skcq6rUmHuiHZQ-76YixFqbQjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 16:21:54 +0200
From: Matteo Croce <mcroce@...hat.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>, Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vchiq: don't leak kernel address
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 3:16 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> The subject doesn't match the patch. It should just be "remove useless
> printk".
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
Well, it avoids leaking an address by removing an useless printk.
It seems that GKH already picked the patch in his staging tree, but
I'm fine with both subjects, really,
Greg?
--
Matteo Croce
per aspera ad upstream
Powered by blists - more mailing lists