[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1570545832-32326-1-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 15:43:49 +0100
From: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
To: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, brendanhiggins@...gle.com,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: mcgrof@...nel.org, keescook@...omium.org, yzaikin@...gle.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, joe.lawrence@...hat.com,
penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp, schowdary@...dia.com,
urezki@...il.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
changbin.du@...el.com, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH linux-kselftest-test 0/3] kunit: support module-based build
For consumers wishing to run kunit on real hardware, it would be
ideal if the kunit framework and tests supported module-based builds.
This is an advantage as it reduces the test task to running
"modprobe mytests.ko", and CONFIG_KUNIT* options can be "always on"
(or rather "always m"). KUnit based tests will load the kunit module
as an implicit dependency.
Alan Maguire (3):
kunit: allow kunit tests to be loaded as a module
kunit: allow kunit to be loaded as a module
kunit: update documentation to describe module-based build
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst | 3 ++-
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst | 3 +++
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 16 +++++++++++++++
include/kunit/test.h | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
kernel/sysctl-test.c | 6 +++++-
kunit/Kconfig | 6 +++---
kunit/Makefile | 9 +++++++++
kunit/assert.c | 8 ++++++++
kunit/example-test.c | 6 +++++-
kunit/string-stream-test.c | 9 +++++++--
kunit/string-stream.c | 7 +++++++
kunit/test-test.c | 8 ++++++--
kunit/test.c | 12 +++++++++++
kunit/try-catch.c | 8 ++++++--
lib/Kconfig.debug | 4 ++--
15 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists