linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/16] x86/cpu: Print VMX features as separate line item in /proc/cpuinfo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALMp9eSM=rq+jEEzPwWNHNxv03F1s2Dysa7euWJ==PaE=b1sMw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Oct 2019 09:53:44 -0700
From:   Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Tony W Wang-oc <TonyWWang-oc@...oxin.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/16] x86/cpu: Print VMX features as separate line item
 in /proc/cpuinfo

On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 11:57 PM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 07/10/19 21:56, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 07:12:37PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> On 04/10/19 23:56, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> >>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
> >>> index cb2e49810d68..4eec8889b0ff 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
> >>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
> >>> @@ -7,6 +7,10 @@
> >>>
> >>>  #include "cpu.h"
> >>>
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_VMX_FEATURE_NAMES
> >>> +extern const char * const x86_vmx_flags[NVMXINTS*32];
> >>> +#endif
> >>> +
> >>>  /*
> >>>   * Get CPU information for use by the procfs.
> >>>   */
> >>> @@ -102,6 +106,17 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> >>>             if (cpu_has(c, i) && x86_cap_flags[i] != NULL)
> >>>                     seq_printf(m, " %s", x86_cap_flags[i]);
> >>
> >> I'm afraid this is going to break some scripts in the wild.  I would
> >> simply remove the seq_puts below.
> >
> > Can you elaborate?  I'm having trouble connecting the dots...
>
> Somebody is bound to have scripts doing "grep ^flags.*ept /proc/cpuinfo"
> or checking for VMX flags under some kind of "if (/^flags/)", so it's
> safer not to separate VMX and non-VMX flags.

Yep. Not quite that exact syntax, but we do have, e.g.:

./x86/feature_check.sh ept

...and you can imagine what feature_check.sh does.