[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191008165942.vxfwbectycuersdx@linux-p48b>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 09:59:42 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: "Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig@....com>
Cc: "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"walken@...gle.com" <walken@...gle.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
J?r?me Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] lib/interval-tree: convert interval_tree to half
closed intervals
On Fri, 04 Oct 2019, Koenig, Christian wrote:
>Am 04.10.19 um 08:57 schrieb Christian König:
>> Am 03.10.19 um 22:18 schrieb Davidlohr Bueso:
>>> The generic tree tree really wants [a, b) intervals, not fully closed.
>>> As such convert it to use the new interval_tree_gen.h. Most of the
>>> conversions are straightforward, with the exception of perhaps
>>> radeon_vm_bo_set_addr(), but semantics have been tried to be left
>>> untouched.
>>
>> NAK, the whole thing won't work.
>>
>> See we need to handle the full device address space which means we
>> have values in the range of 0x0-0xffffffff.
>>
>> If you make this a closed interval then the end would wrap around to
>> 0x0 if long is only 32bit.
>
>Well I've just now re-read the subject line. From that it sounds like
>you are actually trying to fix the interval tree to use a half closed
>interval, e.g. something like [a, b[
Correct.
>
>But your code changes sometimes doesn't seem to reflect that.
Hmm the change simply aims at avoiding the end - 1 trick when dealing
with interval_tree insertions and lookups; the rest of the series
converts other interval tree users in a similar way, albeit some errors
which will be updated. What are your concerns about this patch?
Thanks,
Davidlohr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists