linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] x86/ftrace: Use text

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191008132704.3dc7a441@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Tue, 8 Oct 2019 13:27:04 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mhiramat@...nel.org,
        bristot@...hat.com, jbaron@...mai.com,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...nel.org, namit@...are.com, hpa@...or.com, luto@...nel.org,
        ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] x86/ftrace: Use text_poke()

On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 19:11:37 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 10:43:35AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> > BTW, I'd really like to take this patch series through my tree. That
> > way I can really hammer it, as well as I have code that will be built
> > on top of it.  
> 
> Works for me; or we can have a topic branch in tip we both can use.
> Ingo?

In case you want to use this branch, I just pushed:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace.git

  ftrace/text-poke

That is these 6 patches applied to v5.4-rc2

I'm going to start running them through my tests. I can work on these
directly. And if Ingo wants to pull this into tip, then we can do that,
and apply the other patches on top of them.

Ingo, would that work for you?

-- Steve



> 
> > I'll review the other series in this thread, but I'm assuming they
> > don't rely on this series? Or do they?  
> 
> Indeed, this series stands on it's own. The rest depends on this.