linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] blk-mq: fill header with kernel-doc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <85zhibyt14.fsf@collabora.com>
Date:   Tue, 08 Oct 2019 14:46:31 -0400
From:   Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc:     André Almeida <andrealmeid@...labora.com>,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        axboe@...nel.dk, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] blk-mq: fill header with kernel-doc

Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org> writes:

> On 10/8/19 9:35 AM, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
>> André Almeida <andrealmeid@...labora.com> writes:
>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
>>> index e0fce93ac127..8b745f229789 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
>>> @@ -10,74 +10,153 @@ struct blk_mq_tags;
>>>   struct blk_flush_queue;
>>>     /**
>>> - * struct blk_mq_hw_ctx - State for a hardware queue facing the hardware block device
>>> + * struct blk_mq_hw_ctx - State for a hardware queue facing the hardware
>>> + * block device
>>>    */
>>>   struct blk_mq_hw_ctx {
>>>   	struct {
>>> +		/** @lock: Lock for accessing dispatch queue */
>>>   		spinlock_t		lock;
>>> +		/**
>>> +		 * @dispatch: Queue of dispatched requests, waiting for
>>> +		 * workers to send them to the hardware.
>>> +		 */
>>
>> It's been a few years since I looked at the block layer, but isn't
>> this used to hold requests that were taken from the blk_mq_ctx,  but
>> couldn't be dispatched because the queue was full?
>
> I don't think so. I think that you are looking for the requeue_list
> member of struct request_queue.
>

Hmm, sorry, but I'm confused.  I'm sure I'm missing something simple,
since I haven't touched this in a while, so maybe you can quickly point
me in the right direction?

I see blk_mq_requeue_request() being used by device drivers to retry
requests that failed, but if I read the code correctly, the flushed
queue seems to be moved to hctx->dispatch when the device
driver returned BLK_STS_RESOURCE or BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE to
blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(). I thought BLK_STS_RESOURCE was returned by
the driver on .queue_rq() to signal there was no more resources on the
hardware to service further requests.

-- 
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi