lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4E6A567F-FEC0-479A-A899-55DF6FBB5E13@goldelico.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Oct 2019 21:53:10 +0200
From:   "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
To:     Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
Cc:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Merlijn Wajer <merlijn@...zup.org>,
        Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>,
        Philipp Rossak <embed3d@...il.com>,
        Paweł Chmiel <pawel.mikolaj.chmiel@...il.com>,
        Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
        Filip Matijević <filip.matijevic.pz@...il.com>,
        Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
        moaz korena <moaz@...ena.xyz>,
        James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@...il.com>,
        kernel@...a-handheld.com,
        Discussions about the Letux Kernel 
        <letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org>, maemo-leste@...ts.dyne.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Lay common foundation to make PVR/SGX work without hacks on OMAP34xx, OMAP36xx, AM335x and potentially OMAP4, OMAP5


> Am 09.10.2019 um 18:34 schrieb Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>:
> 
> On 09/10/2019 17:23, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>>> Am 09.10.2019 um 15:55 schrieb Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>:
>>> 
>>> On 09/10/2019 15:53, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>>>>> Am 08.10.2019 um 22:15 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com>:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> But I can't access the sgx registers and get memory faults. Maybe
>>>>> my script has a bug and is trying the wrong address. Have to check
>>>>> with some distance...
>>>> Now I have done more tests on am335x. It is not my script but something else.
>>>> Trying to read 0x5600fe00 after doing
>>>> echo on > /sys/bus/platform/devices/5600fe00.target-module/power/control
>>>> gives page faults.
>>>> When trying to load the kernel driver, the omap_reset_deassert message has
>>>> gone but the driver does no initialize:
>>>> root@...ux:~# modprobe pvrsrvkm_omap_am335x_sgx530_125
>>>> [   45.774712] pvrsrvkm_omap_am335x_sgx530_125: module is from the staging directory, the quality is unknown, you have been warned.
>>>> root@...ux:~#
>>>> Here is the CM/PM register dump after enabling power/control
>>>> *** SGX Register Dump ***
>>>> 0x44E00900 00000301 CM_GFX_L3_CLKSTCTRL
>>>> 0x44E00904 00050000 CM_GFX_GFX_CLKCTRL
>>>> 0x44E0090c 00000002 CM_GFX_L4LS_GFX_CLKSTCTR
>>>> 0x44E00910 00030000 CM_GFX_MMUCFG_CLKCTRL
>>>> 0x44E00914 00030000 CM_GFX_MMUDATA_CLKCTRL
>>>> 0x44E0052c 00000000 CM_DPLL.CLKSEL_GFX_FCLK
>>>> 0x44E01100 00060047 PM_GFX_PWRSTCTRL
>>>> 0x44E01104 00000001 RM_GFX_RSTCTRL
>>>> 0x44E01110 00000037 PM_GFX_PWRSTST
>>> 
>>> Are you sure you have the graphics node properly applied in your kernel?
>> Not really... There are several patch sets which seem to be necessary
>> (to support all omap variants) and I am not sure if I have them all and correctly.
>> I have collected these patches on top of v5.4-rc2:
>> 272d7200c77a ARM: dts: omap5: fix gpu_cm clock provider name
>> 96fa23010f2a dt-bindings: omap: add new binding for PRM instances
>> a164172c1f40 soc: ti: add initial PRM driver with reset control support
>> 42a5e4261993 soc: ti: omap-prm: poll for reset complete during de-assert
>> 9237f39716be soc: ti: omap-prm: add support for denying idle for reset clockdomain
>> bf2ae22e5bcf soc: ti: omap-prm: add omap4 PRM data
>> be5cb64f10e0 soc: ti: omap-prm: add data for am33xx
>> 86646d7d79be soc: ti: omap-prm: add dra7 PRM data
>> c3b5455dfd65 soc: ti: omap-prm: add am4 PRM data
>> e26d4ff7ad15 soc: ti: omap-prm: add omap5 PRM data
>> 66369100d1fc clk: ti: am43xx: drop idlest polling from gfx clock
> 
> You should have similar patch as above for am33xx. Otherwise it will probably fail probing the ti-sysc, resulting in the failure you see.
> 
> -Tero
> 
>> d96899e143de bus: ti-sysc: re-order reset and main clock controls
>> 45071446bd05 bus: ti-sysc: drop the extra hardreset during init
>> 0da134c3aa9d bus: ti-sysc: avoid toggling power state of module during probe
>> 17b70c96b539 ARM: OMAP2+: pdata-quirks: add PRM data for reset support
>> af81a68c65d7 clk: ti: clkctrl: fix setting up clkctrl clocks
>> d7dd7f44bce4 clk: ti: clkctrl: convert to use bit helper macros instead of bitops
>> 42ee8270adfd clk: ti: clkctrl: add new exported API for checking standby info
>> 218b39a8c851 dt-bindings: clk: add omap5 iva clkctrl definitions
>> 41b6c466efde clk: ti: omap5: add IVA subsystem clkctrl data
>> 38cfdebcc2f8 clk: ti: dra7xx: Drop idlest polling from IPU & DSP clkctrl clocks
>> 39e827b0dfe5 clk: ti: omap4: Drop idlest polling from IPU & DSP clkctrl clocks
>> f4584f1e5bff clk: ti: omap5: Drop idlest polling from IPU & DSP clkctrl clocks
>> 1c7f5871e5a0 clk: ti: am43xx: drop idlest polling from pruss clkctrl clock
>> 53363c4cfb3d clk: ti: am33xx: drop idlest polling from pruss clkctrl clock

so the pattern of ^^^ but for gfx clock?

Yes, there seems to be

[PATCH 1/2] clk: ti: am33xx: drop idlest polling from gfx clock

which I am missing. Most likely, I accidentally did download from
patchwork just a single patch (am43xx) and not the series...

With this patch added, I now have access to the sgx registers:

root@...ux:~# ./sgxdump 
*** SGX Register Dump ***
0x44E00900 00000302 CM_GFX_L3_CLKSTCTRL
0x44E00904 00040002 CM_GFX_GFX_CLKCTRL
0x44E0090c 00000002 CM_GFX_L4LS_GFX_CLKSTCTR
0x44E00910 00030000 CM_GFX_MMUCFG_CLKCTRL
0x44E00914 00030000 CM_GFX_MMUDATA_CLKCTRL
0x44E0052c 00000000 CM_DPLL.CLKSEL_GFX_FCLK
0x44E01100 00060047 PM_GFX_PWRSTCTRL
0x44E01104 00000000 RM_GFX_RSTCTRL
0x44E01110 00000037 PM_GFX_PWRSTST
0x5600fe14 00000000 SGX_CORE_VERSION
0x5600fe00 40000000 OCP_REVISION
0x5600fe04 00000005 OCP_HWINFO
0x5600fe10 00000028 OCP_SYSCONFIG
0x5600fe24 00000000 OCP_IRQSTATUS_RA_0
0x5600fe28 00000000 OCP_IRQSTATUS_RA_1
0x5600fe2c 00000000 OCP_IRQSTATUS_RA_2
0x5600fe30 00000000 OCP_IRQSTATUS_0
0x5600fe34 00000000 OCP_IRQSTATUS_1
0x5600fe38 00000000 OCP_IRQSTATUS_2
0x5600fe3c 00000000 OCP_IRQENABLE_SET_0
0x5600fe40 00000000 OCP_IRQENABLE_SET_1
0x5600fe44 00000000 OCP_IRQENABLE_SET_2
0x5600fe48 00000000 OCP_IRQENABLE_CLR_0
0x5600fe4c 00000000 OCP_IRQENABLE_CLR_1
0x5600fe50 00000000 OCP_IRQENABLE_CLR_2
0x5600ff00 00000014 OCP_PAGE_CONFIG
0x5600ff04 00000000 OCP_INTERRUPT_EVENT
0x5600ff08 00000000 OCP_DEBUG_CONFIG
0x5600ff0c 023fe407 OCP_DEBUG_STATUS
0x56000010 01120000 SGX_CORE_VERSION
0x56000014 00010205 SGX_CORE_REVISION
root@...ux:~# root@...ux:~# modprobe pvrsrvkm_omap_am335x_sgx530_125
[  282.569941] pvrsrvkm_omap_am335x_sgx530_125: module is from the staging directory, the quality is unknown, you have been warned.
[  282.673908] [drm] Initialized pvr 1.14.3699939 20110701 for 56000000.sgx on minor 1
root@...ux:~# 

The 0112 of SGX_CORE_VERSION is sgx530 and 010205 is revision -125
as expected.

Starting pvr still reports that the ukernel can not be loaded,
but that is somewhere in the pvrsrvkm code that my driver
only likes the omap5+sgx544 at the moment.

Latest v5.4-rc2 code is here: [1]

Thanks and BR,
Nikolaus

[1]: https://github.com/openpvrsgx-devgroup/linux_openpvrsgx/tree/letux-pvr

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ