linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] perf_event: Add support for LSM and SELinux checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1910100908260.29840@namei.org>
Date:   Thu, 10 Oct 2019 09:11:39 +1100 (AEDT)
From:   James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:     "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>
cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        primiano@...gle.com, rsavitski@...gle.com, jeffv@...gle.com,
        kernel-team@...roid.com, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        Matthew Garrett <matthewgarrett@...gle.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, selinux@...r.kernel.org,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] perf_event: Add support for LSM and SELinux checks

On Wed, 9 Oct 2019, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:

>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> +	err = security_perf_event_alloc(event);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto err_security;
> +#endif

You should not need this ifdef.

> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index 1bc000f834e2..7639bca1db59 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -2373,26 +2373,32 @@ int security_bpf(int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size)
>  {
>  	return call_int_hook(bpf, 0, cmd, attr, size);
>  }
> +
>  int security_bpf_map(struct bpf_map *map, fmode_t fmode)
>  {
>  	return call_int_hook(bpf_map, 0, map, fmode);
>  }
> +
>  int security_bpf_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>  {
>  	return call_int_hook(bpf_prog, 0, prog);
>  }
> +
>  int security_bpf_map_alloc(struct bpf_map *map)
>  {
>  	return call_int_hook(bpf_map_alloc_security, 0, map);
>  }
> +
>  int security_bpf_prog_alloc(struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)
>  {
>  	return call_int_hook(bpf_prog_alloc_security, 0, aux);
>  }
> +
>  void security_bpf_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
>  {
>  	call_void_hook(bpf_map_free_security, map);
>  }
> +
>  void security_bpf_prog_free(struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)
>  {
>  	call_void_hook(bpf_prog_free_security, aux);
> @@ -2404,3 +2410,30 @@ int security_locked_down(enum lockdown_reason what)
>  	return call_int_hook(locked_down, 0, what);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_locked_down);

Please avoid unrelated whitespace changes.


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>