[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191009075700.GK25098@kadam>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 10:57:00 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Chandra Annamaneni <chandra627@...il.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
gneukum1@...il.com, michael.scheiderer@....de,
fabian.krueger@....de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
simon@...anor.nu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KPC2000: kpc2000_spi.c: Fix alignment and style problems.
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 08:50:39PM -0700, Chandra Annamaneni wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000_spi.c b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000_spi.c
> index 3be33c4..a20f2d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000_spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000_spi.c
> @@ -30,19 +30,27 @@
> #include "kpc.h"
>
> static struct mtd_partition p2kr0_spi0_parts[] = {
> - { .name = "SLOT_0", .size = 7798784, .offset = 0, },
> - { .name = "SLOT_1", .size = 7798784, .offset = MTDPART_OFS_NXTBLK},
> - { .name = "SLOT_2", .size = 7798784, .offset = MTDPART_OFS_NXTBLK},
> - { .name = "SLOT_3", .size = 7798784, .offset = MTDPART_OFS_NXTBLK},
> - { .name = "CS0_EXTRA", .size = MTDPART_SIZ_FULL, .offset = MTDPART_OFS_NXTBLK},
> + { .name = "SLOT_0", .size = 7798784, .offset = 0,},
> + { .name = "SLOT_1", .size = 7798784, .offset =
> + MTDPART_OFS_NXTBLK},
This looks worse than the original code... :( You could maybe make it
a little bit tighter if you used space characters.
{ .name = "SLOT_0", .size = 7798784, .offset = 0, },
{ .name = "SLOT_1", .size = 7798784, .offset = MTDPART_OFS_NXTBLK},
{ .name = "SLOT_2", .size = 7798784, .offset = MTDPART_OFS_NXTBLK},
{ .name = "SLOT_3", .size = 7798784, .offset = MTDPART_OFS_NXTBLK},
{ .name = "CS0_EXTRA", .size = MTDPART_SIZ_FULL, .offset = MTDPART_OFS_NXTBLK},
It still goes over 80 characters, but that's okay. Or we could just
leave the original code as is.
[ snip ]
> static struct flash_platform_data p2kr0_spi1_pdata = {
> .name = "SPI1",
> .nr_parts = ARRAY_SIZE(p2kr0_spi1_parts),
> @@ -165,7 +174,7 @@ kp_spi_read_reg(struct kp_spi_controller_state *cs, int idx)
> u64 val;
>
> addr += idx;
> - if ((idx == KP_SPI_REG_CONFIG) && (cs->conf_cache >= 0))
> + if (idx == KP_SPI_REG_CONFIG && cs->conf_cache >= 0)
I like these changes but Greg doesn't. So don't bother with this one.
> return cs->conf_cache;
>
> val = readq(addr);
The rest of the changes are fine. Split them into multiple patches and
resend.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists