[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1570613220-59533-1-git-send-email-wangxu72@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 17:27:00 +0800
From: wangxu <wangxu72@...wei.com>
To: <will@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] ARM/hw_breakpoint: modify dead code for breakpoint_handler()
From: Wang Xu <wangxu72@...wei.com>
In perf_event_alloc(), event->overflow_handler is initialized to a
non-null value, which makes enable_single_step(bp, addr) in
breakpoint_handler() never be executed.
As a matter of fact, the branch condition has been updated to
is_default_overflow_handler().
Signed-off-by: Wang Xu <wangxu72@...wei.com>
---
arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
index b0c195e..586a587 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ static void breakpoint_handler(unsigned long unknown, struct pt_regs *regs)
info->trigger = addr;
pr_debug("breakpoint fired: address = 0x%x\n", addr);
perf_bp_event(bp, regs);
- if (!bp->overflow_handler)
+ if (is_default_overflow_handler(bp))
enable_single_step(bp, addr);
goto unlock;
}
--
1.8.5.6
Powered by blists - more mailing lists