[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191009092954.srlx5wjaqueps7nz@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 11:29:54 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
"open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <Linux-imx@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: imx: Only get second/third IRQ when there
is more than one IRQ
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 11:12:20AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 9:53 AM Uwe Kleine-König
> <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>
> > The patch is fine given the changed behaviour of platform_get_irq. I
> > wonder if it is sensible to introduce a variant of platform_get_irq (say
> > platform_get_irq_nowarn) that behaves like __platform_get_irq does
> > today. Then the imx driver would just call platform_get_irq_nowarn
> > without having to check the number of available irqs first.
>
> It's being discussed in parallel thread about
> platform_get_irq_optional() which won't issue a warning.
This is even already in 5.4-rc1 as
8973ea47901c81a1912bd05f1577bed9b5b52506.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists