lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <644616a9-ec05-1d2e-22fc-93890adb3324@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Oct 2019 18:01:00 +0800
From:   Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "Elena Reshetova" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Jan Glauber <jglauber@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Rework REFCOUNT_FULL using atomic_fetch_*
 operations

On 2019/10/7 23:46, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This is version three of the patches I previously posted here:
> 
>   v1: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190802101000.12958-1-will@kernel.org
>   v2: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190827163204.29903-1-will@kernel.org
> 
> Changes since v2 include:
> 
>   - Remove the x86 assembly version and enable this code unconditionally
>   - Move saturation warnings out-of-line to reduce image bloat
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Will
> 
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Cc: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
> Cc: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
> Cc: Jan Glauber <jglauber@...vell.com>
> 

I tested on top of 5.4-rc2 (with Jan's open-read-close file test case), on a 96 CPU
cores ARM64 server, I can see no much difference under 24 cores (each 24 core is
a NUMA node), but +5.9% performance improve on 48 cores and +8.4% for 96 cores.

For the ARM64 arch,

Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>

Thanks
Hanjun

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ