[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17803d78-3153-cc66-5807-ca27161bccef@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 14:04:07 +0200
From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, jbaron@...mai.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...nel.org, namit@...are.com, hpa@...or.com, luto@...nel.org,
ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] x86/alternatives,jump_label: Provide better
text_poke() batching interface
On 07/10/2019 10:17, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Adding another text_poke_bp_batch() user made me realize the interface
> is all sorts of wrong. The text poke vector should be internal to the
> implementation.
>
> This then results in a trivial interface:
>
> text_poke_queue() - which has the 'normal' text_poke_bp() interface
> text_poke_finish() - which takes no arguments and flushes any
> pending text_poke()s.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Thanks!
-- Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists