[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191009110943.7ff3a08a@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 11:09:43 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] string.h: Mark 34 functions with __must_check
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 14:14:28 +0200
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de> wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 13:53:59 +0200
>
> Several functions return values with which useful data processing
> should be performed. These values must not be ignored then.
> Thus use the annotation “__must_check” in the shown function declarations.
>
> Add also corresponding parameter names for adjusted functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
>
I'm curious. How many warnings showed up when you applied this patch?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists